UK time is: 03:20:45
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

"We Were Vulnerable Right Across The Back Four"

Holland gave his view to the miserable 4-2 defeat at the hands of Carlisle to crewealex.net "The story of the game was what happened in the two penalty areas. We had plenty of chances and had a lot more of the possession than we have previously when coming here but Carlisle were a lot more clinical than us."

"They were also defensively better than us because we have ended up conceding four goals this afternoon and that says it all. We were vulnerable right across the back four and we know that needs improving. That is to take nothing away from Carlisle. I thought they attacked really well, although we were disappointed with some of the goals we conceded. They were avoidable."

"We found ourselves 2-0 down fairly quickly and being behind at Carlisle is hard enough to overcome, never mind with 70 minutes still to go. To their credit the players kept themselves going and scored a well-worked goal soon after. Chris has got in there and we were back in the game. We had decent chances after that as well. Baudet hit the bar with a header and Byron had a good shooting opportunity from outside the penalty area, which he should have put on target but he blazed over. The players had plenty of the ball and in the second half Joel had a great chance to score but didn't. He was then defending their centre forward in front of me and we will have to see what happened after that because Dobie has gone in and made it 3-1 when it should have been 2-2."

"So it is a game of ifs and maybes for us. We were pleased with the chances we created here, but looked vulnerable at the back."

In his usual positive style Holland managed to pick out on positive from the game in James Bailey. He said "I was pleased with James Bailey. It was only his third senior game and he looks fine in there. I am learning about him all the time and he is holding his own at this level."











Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!




Join the FREE Telegraph League One Fantasy Football League!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: pastymaster Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Sunday August 17 2008

Time: 12:40PM

Your Comments

Jeez, how can you lot let the S****s be above you. We need you to swap places at least!
Impish
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Crewe Alexandra Articles

Crewe set for shake-up (Tuesday September 2 2014)

Crewe crash out (Tuesday September 2 2014)

Stats: Crewe Alexandra v Rochdale (Tuesday September 2 2014)

Crewe covered by exit (Tuesday September 2 2014)

We will be strong - Davis (Tuesday September 2 2014)

Davis still hopeful (Monday September 1 2014)

Davis rues opening half (Saturday August 30 2014)

Crewe still pointless (Saturday August 30 2014)

Stats: Gillingham v Crewe Alexandra (Saturday August 30 2014)

New date for Alex (Friday August 29 2014)

Archived Crewe Alexandra Articles

List All Vital Crewe Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. sankeyred 1
2. crewejon 1

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Fleetwood 2 - 1 Crewe
Swindon 2 - 0 Crewe
Gillingham 2 - 0 Crewe
Crewe 2 - 5 Rochdale
Crewe 1 - 2 Barnsley

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
18. Port Vale 5 1 2 2 -1 5
19. Yeovil 5 1 2 2 -4 5
20. Rochdale 5 1 1 3 -1 4
21. Scunthorpe 5 1 1 3 -7 4
22. Walsall 5 0 3 2 -2 3
23. Colchester 5 0 1 4 -5 1
24. Crewe 5 0 0 5 -9 0

Breaking League News

Crewe set for shake-up
Crewe : 02/09/2014 23:19:00
Crewe crash out
Crewe : 02/09/2014 22:37:00
Crewe : 02/09/2014 22:20:00
Yeovil : 02/09/2014 22:14:00
Crawley : 02/09/2014 22:08:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Are Crewe stronger than this time last season?
Suggested By:  Vital Crewe
Yes 57%
No 43%